Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Chris's avatar

Your explanation is 100 times more informative than anything I've heard in the mainstream media. Although this incident happened over a month ago, we still don't have a clear timeline; how he got a gun into that position; why the Secret Service abandon their posts at the critical moment; among many other key questions. In fact, the director of the FBI even questioned whether or not Trump had actually been shot, 3 weeks after the event! We just learned that it was one of the local police who first shot the Crooks and not the Secret Service snipers. No one seems concerned about drilling down to finding out what really happened... That is the real issue.

The media editors who are supposed to encourage investigative journalism are nowhere to be found.

*Editor: a person employed by a newspaper, whose business it is to separate the wheat from the chaff, and to see that the chaff is printed.

Expand full comment
Tall Tim's avatar

This all baloney, but really good baloney... Radio silence is the best clue that sumting wong with outcome.

Expand full comment
26 more comments...

No posts