"All of this is to say that the US federal government has clearly and unmistakably abdicated its primary and organic responsibility to both protect the country from invasion and to uphold the laws in a fair and unbiased manner. All other considerations aside, such as stolen elections and illegitimate office holders, the Legislative branch is funding the invasion, the Executive branch is facilitating it, and the Judicial branch is rubber stamping it. This clearly violates every provision of the Constitution and negates the “social contract” with the electorate, thus making the national power center a rogue entity with no legitimate authority."
Indeed. This is what I have been thinking, and saying to anyone who will listen, for along time. In short form, my appeal is, since they (the federal government) have clearly broken the "contract" or compact, we are not bound to obey either them or the agreement. It is dissolved because the agent refuses to do its duty under the compact.
I can't even say that a party to the compact has violated it because the federal government isn't a party to the compact. The several States are the parties. The federal government is a creation of the compact, not a party to it. This is where this starts to get murky. If the feds are not parties to the agreement, then who has in fact broken the compact? Is it not the States themselves? They have broken the compact with each other. They should do the right thing and abrogate the compact and let each State go its own way.
Similarly, each State has broken faith with its own citizens in that they have taken an active part in not doing their duties, as the citizens have delegated them. Why do we need the States? Each polity in every State should go its own way.
So much here just gets passed over without unpacking. A note about my background, I was born in Los Angeles, moved to Peru in 2004, married a Peruvian in 2006, and returned to the US in 2017. I live in Arizona, a border state, with my wife and kids. It was both easy and difficult to move to Peru. Despite my immigrant status, I was immediately hired as an English teacher and was very popular with the student, all of whom wanted a native speaker. But, the government didn't want me there under the theory that there were Peruvians who speak English, so the job should go to one of them. The mere idea that some government bureaucrat is more qualified to decide who is best for the job than the owner is nonsensical and a point that is just passed over lightly in your essay as though the controversy didn't even exist.
I linked to your essay about child slavery in my latest. Also put a link to it on my new Twitter.
https://l5news.substack.com/p/penetration
I don't think the United States exists. It's only a collection of grifts at this point.
Most Americans have absolutely no understand of the Founding Documents, immigration, or the level of corruption and malfeasance in their Regime.
"All of this is to say that the US federal government has clearly and unmistakably abdicated its primary and organic responsibility to both protect the country from invasion and to uphold the laws in a fair and unbiased manner. All other considerations aside, such as stolen elections and illegitimate office holders, the Legislative branch is funding the invasion, the Executive branch is facilitating it, and the Judicial branch is rubber stamping it. This clearly violates every provision of the Constitution and negates the “social contract” with the electorate, thus making the national power center a rogue entity with no legitimate authority."
Indeed. This is what I have been thinking, and saying to anyone who will listen, for along time. In short form, my appeal is, since they (the federal government) have clearly broken the "contract" or compact, we are not bound to obey either them or the agreement. It is dissolved because the agent refuses to do its duty under the compact.
I can't even say that a party to the compact has violated it because the federal government isn't a party to the compact. The several States are the parties. The federal government is a creation of the compact, not a party to it. This is where this starts to get murky. If the feds are not parties to the agreement, then who has in fact broken the compact? Is it not the States themselves? They have broken the compact with each other. They should do the right thing and abrogate the compact and let each State go its own way.
Similarly, each State has broken faith with its own citizens in that they have taken an active part in not doing their duties, as the citizens have delegated them. Why do we need the States? Each polity in every State should go its own way.
Well, we will never get anywhere when you won't even mention the jews that are behind it all.
They own almost every media company and publishers. No one knows the true history of them and Christians support them over their own.
Listen to Barbara Spectre admit they are behind it.
So much here just gets passed over without unpacking. A note about my background, I was born in Los Angeles, moved to Peru in 2004, married a Peruvian in 2006, and returned to the US in 2017. I live in Arizona, a border state, with my wife and kids. It was both easy and difficult to move to Peru. Despite my immigrant status, I was immediately hired as an English teacher and was very popular with the student, all of whom wanted a native speaker. But, the government didn't want me there under the theory that there were Peruvians who speak English, so the job should go to one of them. The mere idea that some government bureaucrat is more qualified to decide who is best for the job than the owner is nonsensical and a point that is just passed over lightly in your essay as though the controversy didn't even exist.
A good sermon titled “Biblical Law and immigration” can be found at sermonaudio.com
Thank you for this enlightening glimpse into how another country protects its citizens.