I agree with your assessment 100%. And as the Russians already know, the more complex and technological a "weapon" becomes, the more vulnerable it becomes. They build crap on shoestring budgets and pocket the gravy.
I like the scene in Star Trek III, where Scotty notes, "The more they overtake the plumbing, the easier it is to stop up the works." There are so many assumptions in the Doomsday Scenario, and all of it boils down to shadow puppets. We are fed some plausible scenarios, and our imaginations fill in the rest, ultimately creeping ourselves out like ghost stories around the campfire. How much is true? Dust off your research cap and dig around.
The asswipes are in way over their heads. They lie as a matter of course and are nowhere near as clever as their egos have lead them to believe. I'm still waiting for an OS that isn't a buggy, bloated hunk of unmitigated shit. I'm still using XP on my desktop. Still waiting for them to improve on it....I don't think they can.
I fully agree. As Clif High likes to note, the bastards are clever, but they are not smart. Eventually, all man-made systems reach a level of complexity that they collapse under the weight of their assumptions. In the end, the entire AI scenario is based on intelligence being a material - sparks and chemicals - local phenomenon. I firmly believe that it is not. Any tech that tries to "create" intelligence by mirroring physical processes will fail. Full stop. Our human intelligence is a function of Universe and our brains are just antennae. The physical brain acts like RAM on a computer that flushes when you shut it down. The ROM and OS are "out there" and cannot be accessed with plywood and blinky lights.
Exactly. AI has no conscious awareness. No soul. The idea that it's going to somehow become self aware and alive is silly. That is a tale designed to instill fear.
BINGO! Everyone is expected to capitulate because "they" have such marvelous and powerful tools that we humans could never beat. We surrender without a fight!
As I always remind myself, all things are possible, the question is how probable. I had a girlfriend years ago, who was a professional chef trained at CIA (Culinary Institute of America). She made mushrooms from meringue, chocolate and cocoa powder, that if arranged in a basket and set next to the real thing, were virtually indistinguishable from a couple of feet away. I've built hundreds of props over the years that, on camera or stage, look quite plausible and real, but are nothing more than molded plastic, hot glue, bubblegum, and bailing wire.
I don't discount the possibility of dangerous and out of control tech, but I also know that if I tell you a thing is another thing, and you believe it, then it is real to you for all intents and purposes. That's the basis of magic. And as Arthur Clarke noted, "All sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
I believe the proper course is to be vigilant but not credulous. In the absence of verifiable facts, we must assume the negative postulate. But stay vigilant.
But Dr Mihalcea does not work for the government but directly against it.
She has a brigade of MDs and Attorneys verifying , duplicating and advocating her research, and petitioning state and local lawmakers to ban the Jab.
None of us have insider info unless we are actually insiders.
I don't even have any way to guess if AI is even relevant to Nanotech in humans or if it all revolves around 5G, as seems superficially to be the case.
But I strongly doubt biubble gum or balling wire or Photoshop or even AI itself has any bearing on the array of MDs doing Dark Field photography and raising the alarm on Nanotech.
One of their biggest discoveries is that the legendary " Rubbery Clots" are comprised mainly of medical/research materials and are brought on by the Nanotech.
I would warn anyone interested that Dr Ana breaks stuff down as much as she can, to really get any real understanding you will need recourse to an online dictionary literally dozens of times per the average post.
Even if you choose to reject the photos, the understanding of the rubbery clots alone I'd worth the price of admission, which is zero.
For all the work she does, she doesn't even restrict comments to paid subscribers.
I have found ignoring sites that require subscription to comment saves me wasting time on blithering idiots like that Mega Twit Berenson the Scammer.
He has his suckers financing another court case for him now ...
I have subbed to the good Doctor's stack, because I always want more high-quality information on anything. I am a certified Biomedical Photographer with several years in the medical field, so I look forward to the images and findings.
I have no truck with nanotech. It works much like drone swarms at the microscopic level, and there are credible reports of it being used to manufacture at the molecular level, though I've never witnessed it being demonstrated. I have no problem believing that it can create the clots you and many others have mentioned, and visible in seemingly genuine autopsy/embalming footage. It was also a major issue in my decision to stay as far away from the Frankenvaxxx as I possibly could.
As for 5G, I've worked around many types of radiation all my career, from FM/AM, to VHF/UHF, to shortwave and microwave. I am pretty well versed on what it can and cannot do. To the best of my knowledge, 5G power levels and frequencies have a mard time penetrating skin, much less other organs. It's a very short wave and the power levels are very low, due to the limitations of powering thousands of transmitters 24/7. I am willing to have my mind changed, but that is what I know at this time. We spend our lives swimming in an ocean of natural and man-made radiation. I see no reason at this time to be concerned more about 5G, than say UV-B from the Sun.
I have learned from many decades as a conspiracy wingnut to avoid hysterical reports of some new revelation. Those are usually planted to discredit anyone discussing the real stuff. The panic and hyperventilation over AI has all the look and feel of a planted meme. I can think of dozens of reasons why - and talk about them in Sunday's upcoming column - but the primary issue at first blush is to remain calm and take a cold hard look at this stuff. Needless to say, I'm more concerned about bloody revolution and UN troops marching down my alley at the moment.
I agree with your assessment 100%. And as the Russians already know, the more complex and technological a "weapon" becomes, the more vulnerable it becomes. They build crap on shoestring budgets and pocket the gravy.
I like the scene in Star Trek III, where Scotty notes, "The more they overtake the plumbing, the easier it is to stop up the works." There are so many assumptions in the Doomsday Scenario, and all of it boils down to shadow puppets. We are fed some plausible scenarios, and our imaginations fill in the rest, ultimately creeping ourselves out like ghost stories around the campfire. How much is true? Dust off your research cap and dig around.
The asswipes are in way over their heads. They lie as a matter of course and are nowhere near as clever as their egos have lead them to believe. I'm still waiting for an OS that isn't a buggy, bloated hunk of unmitigated shit. I'm still using XP on my desktop. Still waiting for them to improve on it....I don't think they can.
I fully agree. As Clif High likes to note, the bastards are clever, but they are not smart. Eventually, all man-made systems reach a level of complexity that they collapse under the weight of their assumptions. In the end, the entire AI scenario is based on intelligence being a material - sparks and chemicals - local phenomenon. I firmly believe that it is not. Any tech that tries to "create" intelligence by mirroring physical processes will fail. Full stop. Our human intelligence is a function of Universe and our brains are just antennae. The physical brain acts like RAM on a computer that flushes when you shut it down. The ROM and OS are "out there" and cannot be accessed with plywood and blinky lights.
Exactly. AI has no conscious awareness. No soul. The idea that it's going to somehow become self aware and alive is silly. That is a tale designed to instill fear.
BINGO! Everyone is expected to capitulate because "they" have such marvelous and powerful tools that we humans could never beat. We surrender without a fight!
Do you read Dr Ana Maria Mihalcea:s Stack?
She is both an MD and a PhD in Pathology.
She does Dark Field photography on vaxxed and unvaxxed blood, and finds Nanotech in both.
I know they bluff, but historically, even counting purposeful leaks, they are at least fifty years ahead of us in their management plan.
Maybe a high speed analysis tool is all they really need to manage people through 5G and Nanotech.
As I always remind myself, all things are possible, the question is how probable. I had a girlfriend years ago, who was a professional chef trained at CIA (Culinary Institute of America). She made mushrooms from meringue, chocolate and cocoa powder, that if arranged in a basket and set next to the real thing, were virtually indistinguishable from a couple of feet away. I've built hundreds of props over the years that, on camera or stage, look quite plausible and real, but are nothing more than molded plastic, hot glue, bubblegum, and bailing wire.
I don't discount the possibility of dangerous and out of control tech, but I also know that if I tell you a thing is another thing, and you believe it, then it is real to you for all intents and purposes. That's the basis of magic. And as Arthur Clarke noted, "All sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
I believe the proper course is to be vigilant but not credulous. In the absence of verifiable facts, we must assume the negative postulate. But stay vigilant.
I have a skeptical nature myself.
But Dr Mihalcea does not work for the government but directly against it.
She has a brigade of MDs and Attorneys verifying , duplicating and advocating her research, and petitioning state and local lawmakers to ban the Jab.
None of us have insider info unless we are actually insiders.
I don't even have any way to guess if AI is even relevant to Nanotech in humans or if it all revolves around 5G, as seems superficially to be the case.
But I strongly doubt biubble gum or balling wire or Photoshop or even AI itself has any bearing on the array of MDs doing Dark Field photography and raising the alarm on Nanotech.
One of their biggest discoveries is that the legendary " Rubbery Clots" are comprised mainly of medical/research materials and are brought on by the Nanotech.
I would warn anyone interested that Dr Ana breaks stuff down as much as she can, to really get any real understanding you will need recourse to an online dictionary literally dozens of times per the average post.
Even if you choose to reject the photos, the understanding of the rubbery clots alone I'd worth the price of admission, which is zero.
For all the work she does, she doesn't even restrict comments to paid subscribers.
I have found ignoring sites that require subscription to comment saves me wasting time on blithering idiots like that Mega Twit Berenson the Scammer.
He has his suckers financing another court case for him now ...
I have subbed to the good Doctor's stack, because I always want more high-quality information on anything. I am a certified Biomedical Photographer with several years in the medical field, so I look forward to the images and findings.
I have no truck with nanotech. It works much like drone swarms at the microscopic level, and there are credible reports of it being used to manufacture at the molecular level, though I've never witnessed it being demonstrated. I have no problem believing that it can create the clots you and many others have mentioned, and visible in seemingly genuine autopsy/embalming footage. It was also a major issue in my decision to stay as far away from the Frankenvaxxx as I possibly could.
As for 5G, I've worked around many types of radiation all my career, from FM/AM, to VHF/UHF, to shortwave and microwave. I am pretty well versed on what it can and cannot do. To the best of my knowledge, 5G power levels and frequencies have a mard time penetrating skin, much less other organs. It's a very short wave and the power levels are very low, due to the limitations of powering thousands of transmitters 24/7. I am willing to have my mind changed, but that is what I know at this time. We spend our lives swimming in an ocean of natural and man-made radiation. I see no reason at this time to be concerned more about 5G, than say UV-B from the Sun.
I have learned from many decades as a conspiracy wingnut to avoid hysterical reports of some new revelation. Those are usually planted to discredit anyone discussing the real stuff. The panic and hyperventilation over AI has all the look and feel of a planted meme. I can think of dozens of reasons why - and talk about them in Sunday's upcoming column - but the primary issue at first blush is to remain calm and take a cold hard look at this stuff. Needless to say, I'm more concerned about bloody revolution and UN troops marching down my alley at the moment.