I used to look at the whole globalist theory as with great skepticism. It seemed to be a strange proposition, much like reptile people living under the Earth à la Blavatsky, etc. However, we now cannot deny ---after the era of covid--- that there does seem to be a web of like-minded individuals and institutes that have an anti-nationalist agenda. Western leaders, such as Justin Trudeau, personify the movement and openly pay allegiance to it to the detriment of their citizens.
Much like Specter in the James Bond movies, it is super-national movement that has its tentacles everywhere. In fact, I'm sure Trudy will find himself a plum position at the Tony Blair Institute or with the Clinton or Bill Gates Global Institutions. The globalists as a rule take care of their own and pay their acolytes well for betraying their own peoples.
Indeed, the "revolving door" between public and private sectors is a key aspect of the fascist operation. If an individual has an agenda to activate, they are placed in a high public office where they install and start-up the operations, then they revolved back into the private sector to distribute the funds and administer the organization that implements the agenda.
To me it is so plainly obvious, but for some reason a lot of folks refuse to see it. Part of that can be blamed on indoctrination and an inability to see any other way, but at the expense of self-interest goes against logic. I suppose it's a kind of contagious insanity.
Trudy -- phew -- there's a piece of work. KaMAla Harris seems to be cut from the same cloth.
It does to maintain the general perception that corporations and government are separate entities, and that government is functioning to control corporations and prevent injury to humans. At some point, I assume the illusion will be dropped. The veil is already theadbare.
I've noticed that Fascism, Socialism, and Feudalism share the same type of hierarchical, pyramidal power structure. Since corporations did not become widespread until the industrial revolution, the partnership was between the Government and the Church. I believe that the perception of struggle between both partners is necessary in order to keep the general population in check by giving them sides to choose, rather than fighting for their own interests, though uprisings were still common. Feudalism, or some variation of it, seems to be the default/lowest common denominator form of government. It's just so easy to implement.
Chris, I also am against the nation-state. It's a failed idea. But unlike the globalists, I want to go small into diversified communities of people cooperating with each other. Perhaps even go back to tribes where the maximum size was around 170 people. The Scottish clans would be an example.
The nation-state was created as an intermediate step to the pyramid structure. I agree that small autonomous communities, where an individual is the supreme authority on his/her property, with a public sphere for trade and social interaction. Unified action has the same benefits as collective action, but collectives require a cult-like membership quality that I find replusive.
Rufus: I hate joining groups, clubs, political parties,... I'm not a team player and never have been. Something just feels wrong about being part of a collective.
Regarding your point about the puppets being taken care of; have you noticed the physical appearance of some of these people? Ardern, Blair, Clinton, Gates - there are many others- all look like they are shrivelling up. They are all mega wealthy and yet their appearance suggests a hard life lived. It's curious and I can't wait to see what happens to Justine Trudeau-Castro's mug.
My mother made a similar observation years ago. It was inference to the deterioration of American presidents while in office, as if life was literally being sucked out of them. At the time, she was referring to LBJ, Nixon and Carter, but the observation can be extended to all the names you mentioned and more. I also note that Putin seems to be aging well, despite having been president for well over two decades, and being 72 years old.
Putin is really 74, his birth certificate was issued not on the day of his birth but writing of it . Putin gets lots of botox and other cosmetic procedures to keep up with his lover A. Kabayeva and his young sons he had with her, age 6 and 9.
Putin, Trump, Xi, all look pretty good - not shrivelliing up at all. They may not be entirely good people but it's a pretty clear signal they haven't signed away their spiritual anatomy to a certain someone who shall remain nameless.
Actually, it's an anacronym, where the long form is rarely if ever used, and the acronym itself has become a term of its own (see "laser"). Under British grammar, anacronyms capitalize the first letter, as with a proper noun, but is otherwise written as a common word (see "Nasa").
"Nylon" is generally considered to be a portmanteau of "new" and "London," coined by DuPont in the 1930s. I am not sure why those two words would be chosen, though "new" seems self-evident. In any case, it is not strictly an anacronym.
I can answer that one. The process was invented simultaneously in New York and London. Hence the name. I suggest that NY is self-evident. New is the stretch. Thanks for the clarifications on acronym and anacronym, and for the portmanteau. It is a small treasure to find people who are interested in language and truth.
I suspect that you are right on target with this report Mr. Farside. Of course, many of us who have managed to keep our eyes opened while the majority become woke, are, and have been aware of this for quite a while now. Personally, my education began many years ago while playing the role of grunt in SE Asia. It could not have been more obvious that the whole play was about transferring as much public money (taxes) to all those corporations making up the MICIMATT at the time. So many big players banking so much money, while all the death and destruction was just so much "collateral damage" that had zero effect on the bottom line.. And, nothing has changed since then except for a few names and initials fronting those same for profit entities.
You ask what can be done about it, and state the obvious that elections only act to re-enforce the status quo. My little plan is to just ignore it as much as possible--owning free and clear a small acreage in the woods, growing as much food as possible, and saying no to all those government ag programs that give out lots of money in exchange for complete control over your life. If the PTB decide to make private property illegal, all I will do is quote some famous Texans--Come and Take it. Of course, being a rather vintage model, I have no idea if I'll get to see the resolution of the current crisis (hope so) and also have no idea if any of my progeny will continue what I have started (again--hope so). All that I do know is that in every dystopian novel I have ever read (and I read a lot), there is always an "OUTLAW" group living out side the walls of the populations prisons. That's where I want to live and eventually pass on to my next great adventure.
My full initiation into the fascist mind was in the wake of Katrina in New Orleans. I saw the NGOs and QGOs at work first hand, and it made me sick, especially in their take-over of a city with such rich history and culture.
I, too, have my place in the woods, though I haven't fully achieved divorce from the rat race, though I am closing in on it daily. In the final analysis, ownership of property is wholly dependent on the ability to defend it, which is why there is such a push to disarm everyone. I slip of paper called a "Title" can easily be torn up and/or ignored. It has no magic power in and of itself. I would also like to see the outcome and be a part of steering it, but alas I fear that I am more like Moses than Salomon, and perhaps that's for the best.
Vonu: Fascism consists of thieves helping thieves rob us all. All governments are thieves helping thieves rob us all. These thieves just argue about how to split up the loot.
Rufus, Flags, lots of flags. Robes, suits, ties, salutes, a band, balloons, oratory (well, not so much oratory anymore, too dumb), and those sets in the Oval Office etc. Quite a show.
The only viable solution is Enlightened Anarchy. A man (for brevity's sake) is the ultimate authority on his land, and manners and a side arm controls the rest.
This article perfectly summarizes our predicament. While we may have the numbers, they have the power and enforcement mechanisms. They have also been working on reducing the numbers of those who might oppose them, with their takeover of our educational system and other organizations that might have opposed them. Our numerical superiority is being diminished by those who do not feel there is anything worth fighting for. Living paycheck to paycheck is a for sure way to keep people in line. The importation of millions of illegal invaders may have been a step too far for our Nazi/marxist leaders because we still have hundreds of millions of firearms despite their best efforts to take them away. More and more are buying guns and training as they can see the writing on the wall, so to speak, and most will have to fight what has been brought to subject and even murder them. Survival is still the strongest instinct, especially among those trained in weapons use.
Great comment, John, thanks! I note, though, that "they" want us to go kinetic. That feeds directly into "their" narradigm that us sane folks are the problem. Instead, "they" are trying to goad us into starting the fight, using language as a weapon. "They" have power only insofar as we give it to them. The 3 primary control mechanisms are money, education and religion, in that order. Remove them from the game, and the rest will follow.
The attacks on the family destroy the roots of the system. The Bumble Dicks are idiots! Wealth isn't money or gold or jewels or land; it is people. Destroy the family and you destroy people and wealth. AI robots are not going to save the Bumble Dicks. The system will collapse on itself.
What replaces it? Something much worse or something much better. The result is up to the people.
Exactly. The Bumbledicks think that they can control the masses by undermining the family and transferring that loyalty to their institutions. People don't work that way, though. Humans have an innate desire to be independent, even though they can be imprinted with certain loyalties. Many never move beyond that level (NPC), but the majority cannot be forced into an unnatural state of subservience. Ask any slave, no matter how many generations your folks have been captive, there is always an overwhelming desire to escape.
The structures and architecture that he describes function so well because human nature is such that humans are susceptible and geared to follow mandates and social mores. Note the pressure that the independent thinker is under when it comes to vaxxing and masking. Loss of employment, exile from society, decertification . . . Yes, forcing people into servitude is the simplest way to insure the behavior that totalitarians require. Few can stand up to it. For many it is mothers' milk.
Humans do have an innate herding instinct, however I believe it has been weaponized by the fascists into a hive mind, or collectivism. Herds are egalitarian, but hives are hierarchical. Humans gravitate to the hive because of a system of "carrots and sticks," equating to rewards for compliance and pain for dissent. This system is not natural, but is rather environmental, and the fascists are increasingly controlling the environment, literally and figuratively.
I used to look at the whole globalist theory as with great skepticism. It seemed to be a strange proposition, much like reptile people living under the Earth à la Blavatsky, etc. However, we now cannot deny ---after the era of covid--- that there does seem to be a web of like-minded individuals and institutes that have an anti-nationalist agenda. Western leaders, such as Justin Trudeau, personify the movement and openly pay allegiance to it to the detriment of their citizens.
Much like Specter in the James Bond movies, it is super-national movement that has its tentacles everywhere. In fact, I'm sure Trudy will find himself a plum position at the Tony Blair Institute or with the Clinton or Bill Gates Global Institutions. The globalists as a rule take care of their own and pay their acolytes well for betraying their own peoples.
Indeed, the "revolving door" between public and private sectors is a key aspect of the fascist operation. If an individual has an agenda to activate, they are placed in a high public office where they install and start-up the operations, then they revolved back into the private sector to distribute the funds and administer the organization that implements the agenda.
To me it is so plainly obvious, but for some reason a lot of folks refuse to see it. Part of that can be blamed on indoctrination and an inability to see any other way, but at the expense of self-interest goes against logic. I suppose it's a kind of contagious insanity.
Trudy -- phew -- there's a piece of work. KaMAla Harris seems to be cut from the same cloth.
Fascism requires no doors between corporations and government, let alone walls.
It does to maintain the general perception that corporations and government are separate entities, and that government is functioning to control corporations and prevent injury to humans. At some point, I assume the illusion will be dropped. The veil is already theadbare.
Unless corporations have powers to tax and seize property through eminent domain, they are different from governments.
Vonu: In the USA, corporations use government to steal land through eminent domain. Look up "The Battle of Chavez Ravine" in Los Angeles.
Read "The Milagro Beanfield War"
You must have missed the Louisiana Purchase.
As noted, corporations use government to enact their agendas. That is the defining characteristic of fascism.
By whose established lexicography?
I've noticed that Fascism, Socialism, and Feudalism share the same type of hierarchical, pyramidal power structure. Since corporations did not become widespread until the industrial revolution, the partnership was between the Government and the Church. I believe that the perception of struggle between both partners is necessary in order to keep the general population in check by giving them sides to choose, rather than fighting for their own interests, though uprisings were still common. Feudalism, or some variation of it, seems to be the default/lowest common denominator form of government. It's just so easy to implement.
Chris, I also am against the nation-state. It's a failed idea. But unlike the globalists, I want to go small into diversified communities of people cooperating with each other. Perhaps even go back to tribes where the maximum size was around 170 people. The Scottish clans would be an example.
The nation-state was created as an intermediate step to the pyramid structure. I agree that small autonomous communities, where an individual is the supreme authority on his/her property, with a public sphere for trade and social interaction. Unified action has the same benefits as collective action, but collectives require a cult-like membership quality that I find replusive.
Rufus: I hate joining groups, clubs, political parties,... I'm not a team player and never have been. Something just feels wrong about being part of a collective.
Regarding your point about the puppets being taken care of; have you noticed the physical appearance of some of these people? Ardern, Blair, Clinton, Gates - there are many others- all look like they are shrivelling up. They are all mega wealthy and yet their appearance suggests a hard life lived. It's curious and I can't wait to see what happens to Justine Trudeau-Castro's mug.
My mother made a similar observation years ago. It was inference to the deterioration of American presidents while in office, as if life was literally being sucked out of them. At the time, she was referring to LBJ, Nixon and Carter, but the observation can be extended to all the names you mentioned and more. I also note that Putin seems to be aging well, despite having been president for well over two decades, and being 72 years old.
Putin is really 74, his birth certificate was issued not on the day of his birth but writing of it . Putin gets lots of botox and other cosmetic procedures to keep up with his lover A. Kabayeva and his young sons he had with her, age 6 and 9.
Rufus: I'm 72. Putin looks a lot better than me.
Putin, Trump, Xi, all look pretty good - not shrivelliing up at all. They may not be entirely good people but it's a pretty clear signal they haven't signed away their spiritual anatomy to a certain someone who shall remain nameless.
SPECTRE is an acronym for Special Executive for Counter-intelligence, Terrorism, Revenge and Extortion. Acronyms should be capitalized.
Actually, it's an anacronym, where the long form is rarely if ever used, and the acronym itself has become a term of its own (see "laser"). Under British grammar, anacronyms capitalize the first letter, as with a proper noun, but is otherwise written as a common word (see "Nasa").
According to Oxford, an anacronym is "an acronym formed from the initial letters of a phrase that is not widely known (e.g. Nicam, scuba )."
SPECTRE is very well known to James Bond fans.
Exactly.
And Nylon. How many people know that comes from?
"Nylon" is generally considered to be a portmanteau of "new" and "London," coined by DuPont in the 1930s. I am not sure why those two words would be chosen, though "new" seems self-evident. In any case, it is not strictly an anacronym.
The nylon patent was issued in September 1938.
I can answer that one. The process was invented simultaneously in New York and London. Hence the name. I suggest that NY is self-evident. New is the stretch. Thanks for the clarifications on acronym and anacronym, and for the portmanteau. It is a small treasure to find people who are interested in language and truth.
nylon is not an acronym.
I didn't say that it was. But I'm here to learn.
Some people think it comes from a plant.
Ha-ha, Name one! It comes from New York/London because of where it was invented.
To your parting question - Anarchy, in the truest sense of the word.
I agree wholeheartedly. It will take some effort, though, to remove the tarnish that the authoritarians have put on the concept.
Decades at least.
I suspect that you are right on target with this report Mr. Farside. Of course, many of us who have managed to keep our eyes opened while the majority become woke, are, and have been aware of this for quite a while now. Personally, my education began many years ago while playing the role of grunt in SE Asia. It could not have been more obvious that the whole play was about transferring as much public money (taxes) to all those corporations making up the MICIMATT at the time. So many big players banking so much money, while all the death and destruction was just so much "collateral damage" that had zero effect on the bottom line.. And, nothing has changed since then except for a few names and initials fronting those same for profit entities.
You ask what can be done about it, and state the obvious that elections only act to re-enforce the status quo. My little plan is to just ignore it as much as possible--owning free and clear a small acreage in the woods, growing as much food as possible, and saying no to all those government ag programs that give out lots of money in exchange for complete control over your life. If the PTB decide to make private property illegal, all I will do is quote some famous Texans--Come and Take it. Of course, being a rather vintage model, I have no idea if I'll get to see the resolution of the current crisis (hope so) and also have no idea if any of my progeny will continue what I have started (again--hope so). All that I do know is that in every dystopian novel I have ever read (and I read a lot), there is always an "OUTLAW" group living out side the walls of the populations prisons. That's where I want to live and eventually pass on to my next great adventure.
My full initiation into the fascist mind was in the wake of Katrina in New Orleans. I saw the NGOs and QGOs at work first hand, and it made me sick, especially in their take-over of a city with such rich history and culture.
I, too, have my place in the woods, though I haven't fully achieved divorce from the rat race, though I am closing in on it daily. In the final analysis, ownership of property is wholly dependent on the ability to defend it, which is why there is such a push to disarm everyone. I slip of paper called a "Title" can easily be torn up and/or ignored. It has no magic power in and of itself. I would also like to see the outcome and be a part of steering it, but alas I fear that I am more like Moses than Salomon, and perhaps that's for the best.
Have you read this? It's a dense read but I found it illuminating:
https://www.wob.com/en-gb/books/jim-marrs/rise-of-the-fourth-reich/9780061245596?gad_source=1#GOR007960718
Fascism is incestuous control of corporations and government by corporations and government.
Its most obvious manifestation are public/private projects taking over everything, funded by the private central bank.
Yup, ontology recapitulates philology.
Vonu: Fascism consists of thieves helping thieves rob us all. All governments are thieves helping thieves rob us all. These thieves just argue about how to split up the loot.
And they use magic symbols and high-sounding language to make it all sound legit.
Rufus, Flags, lots of flags. Robes, suits, ties, salutes, a band, balloons, oratory (well, not so much oratory anymore, too dumb), and those sets in the Oval Office etc. Quite a show.
We should stop arguing about how to split up the government and get to it.
Vonu, I agree. Kill the State.
The only viable solution is Enlightened Anarchy. A man (for brevity's sake) is the ultimate authority on his land, and manners and a side arm controls the rest.
The Zionist approach to Gaza would work well. Deprive it of everything it needs to survive, beginning with the boycott of bipartisan candidates.
This article perfectly summarizes our predicament. While we may have the numbers, they have the power and enforcement mechanisms. They have also been working on reducing the numbers of those who might oppose them, with their takeover of our educational system and other organizations that might have opposed them. Our numerical superiority is being diminished by those who do not feel there is anything worth fighting for. Living paycheck to paycheck is a for sure way to keep people in line. The importation of millions of illegal invaders may have been a step too far for our Nazi/marxist leaders because we still have hundreds of millions of firearms despite their best efforts to take them away. More and more are buying guns and training as they can see the writing on the wall, so to speak, and most will have to fight what has been brought to subject and even murder them. Survival is still the strongest instinct, especially among those trained in weapons use.
Great comment, John, thanks! I note, though, that "they" want us to go kinetic. That feeds directly into "their" narradigm that us sane folks are the problem. Instead, "they" are trying to goad us into starting the fight, using language as a weapon. "They" have power only insofar as we give it to them. The 3 primary control mechanisms are money, education and religion, in that order. Remove them from the game, and the rest will follow.
A True Bill
Rufus, I see that this article is on the Lew Rockwell site today. Congratulations!
Cheers! Rense picked it up, as well, and Joseph Farrell may run it in TidBits this week. Made a bit of a splash, it seems.
Rufus, It's a good article with a catchy title.
The attacks on the family destroy the roots of the system. The Bumble Dicks are idiots! Wealth isn't money or gold or jewels or land; it is people. Destroy the family and you destroy people and wealth. AI robots are not going to save the Bumble Dicks. The system will collapse on itself.
What replaces it? Something much worse or something much better. The result is up to the people.
Exactly. The Bumbledicks think that they can control the masses by undermining the family and transferring that loyalty to their institutions. People don't work that way, though. Humans have an innate desire to be independent, even though they can be imprinted with certain loyalties. Many never move beyond that level (NPC), but the majority cannot be forced into an unnatural state of subservience. Ask any slave, no matter how many generations your folks have been captive, there is always an overwhelming desire to escape.
The structures and architecture that he describes function so well because human nature is such that humans are susceptible and geared to follow mandates and social mores. Note the pressure that the independent thinker is under when it comes to vaxxing and masking. Loss of employment, exile from society, decertification . . . Yes, forcing people into servitude is the simplest way to insure the behavior that totalitarians require. Few can stand up to it. For many it is mothers' milk.
Humans do have an innate herding instinct, however I believe it has been weaponized by the fascists into a hive mind, or collectivism. Herds are egalitarian, but hives are hierarchical. Humans gravitate to the hive because of a system of "carrots and sticks," equating to rewards for compliance and pain for dissent. This system is not natural, but is rather environmental, and the fascists are increasingly controlling the environment, literally and figuratively.
https://youtu.be/THKnCTv53BI?si=DaGZfqE-D1IUepoC
Best visualization of global governance I've come across. Nice one!
Cheers! It has a certain crystalline appearance in my mind. Beautiful but rigid with little room to move.